feat(routing): engage modes + sender scope + accumulate/drop + per-agent fan-out

Replaces the opaque trigger_rules JSON + response_scope enum on
messaging_group_agents with four explicit orthogonal columns:

    engage_mode            'pattern' | 'mention' | 'mention-sticky'
    engage_pattern         regex source; required when mode='pattern';
                           '.' is the "always" sentinel
    sender_scope           'all' | 'known'
    ignored_message_policy 'drop' | 'accumulate'

Inbound routing becomes a fan-out — every wired agent is evaluated
independently. A match gets its own session + container wake. A miss
with accumulate keeps the message as context-only (trigger=0) in that
agent's session, so when the agent does eventually engage it sees the
prior chatter.

## Schema

- Migration 010 (`engage-modes`): adds the 4 new columns, backfills
  from trigger_rules.pattern + requiresTrigger + response_scope, drops
  the legacy columns.
- messages_in gains `trigger INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 1` (session DB
  schema + `migrateMessagesInTable` forward-compat).
- countDueMessages gates waking on `trigger = 1`.

## Routing

- `pickAgent` (returns one) → loop over all wired agents. Per agent:
  evaluate engage_mode; run access gate + sender-scope gate; on full
  match → resolveSession + writeSessionMessage(trigger=1) + wake. On
  miss with accumulate → writeSessionMessage(trigger=0), no wake. On
  miss with drop → skip.
- New `findSessionForAgent(agentGroupId, mgId, threadId)` scopes
  session lookup by agent so fan-out doesn't cross sessions.
- `messageIdForAgent` namespaces inbound message ids by agent_group_id
  so PRIMARY KEY doesn't collide across per-agent session DBs.

## Adapter layer

- `ConversationConfig` replaces `triggerPattern` + `requiresTrigger`
  with `engageMode` + `engagePattern`.
- Chat SDK bridge stores `Map<platformId, ConversationConfig[]>` (multi-
  agent per conversation) and applies union gating pre-onInbound:
    * onSubscribedMessage: engage if any wiring keeps firing in
      subscribed state (mention-sticky or pattern)
    * onNewMention: engage on mention; only subscribes the thread if
      at least one wiring is `mention-sticky`
    * onDirectMessage: engage per mode; sticky follows same rule
- Bridge no longer unconditionally calls `thread.subscribe()`.

## Sender scope

- Permissions module registers a second hook `setSenderScopeGate` that
  runs per-wiring after the existing access gate. `sender_scope='known'`
  requires canAccessAgentGroup(); `'all'` is a no-op. Not installed →
  no-op everywhere (default allow).

## Container side

- Host passes `NANOCLAW_MAX_MESSAGES_PER_PROMPT` (reuses existing
  MAX_MESSAGES_PER_PROMPT config; was dead code from v1).
- `getPendingMessages` queries `ORDER BY seq DESC LIMIT N`, reverses to
  chronological order for the prompt — accumulated context rides along
  with trigger rows up to the cap.
- `MessageInRow` gains `trigger: number` so the container can tell them
  apart in downstream code (container still processes both; only the
  host uses `trigger=0` for don't-wake).

## Defaults (per ACTION-ITEMS item 1 decision)

- DM (is_group=0): `engage_mode='pattern'`, `engage_pattern='.'` (always)
- Threaded group: `engage_mode='mention-sticky'` (seed-discord)
- Non-threaded group / CLI: pattern '.' in bootstrap scripts

## Tests

- src/host-core.test.ts: 3 new cases — fan-out (2 agents, 2 sessions,
  2 wakes), accumulate (trigger=0 + no wake), drop (no session created).
- Existing 10 host-core tests still pass.
- Migration 010 runs on an empty DB in 0-row path — verified.

Closes: ACTION-ITEMS items 1, 4.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
gavrielc
2026-04-20 01:30:04 +03:00
parent 6a815190c0
commit 16b9499532
22 changed files with 688 additions and 125 deletions

View File

@@ -9,8 +9,19 @@
export interface ConversationConfig {
platformId: string;
agentGroupId: string;
triggerPattern?: string; // regex string (for native channels)
requiresTrigger: boolean;
/**
* When does the agent engage on messages from this conversation?
*
* 'pattern' — regex test against message text; engagePattern='.'
* means "always" (match everything)
* 'mention' — fires only on @mention
* 'mention-sticky' — fires on @mention, then auto-subscribes to the thread
* and treats subsequent messages as engage-all.
* Threaded platforms only (Slack/Discord/Linear).
*/
engageMode: 'pattern' | 'mention' | 'mention-sticky';
/** Regex source when engageMode='pattern'. '.' is the "always" sentinel. */
engagePattern?: string | null;
sessionMode: 'shared' | 'per-thread' | 'agent-shared';
}

View File

@@ -148,8 +148,10 @@ describe('channel + router integration', () => {
id: 'mga-1',
messaging_group_id: 'mg-1',
agent_group_id: 'ag-1',
trigger_rules: null,
response_scope: 'all',
engage_mode: 'pattern',
engage_pattern: '.',
sender_scope: 'all',
ignored_message_policy: 'drop',
session_mode: 'shared',
priority: 0,
created_at: now(),

View File

@@ -71,23 +71,89 @@ export function createChatSdkBridge(config: ChatSdkBridgeConfig): ChannelAdapter
let chat: Chat;
let state: SqliteStateAdapter;
let setupConfig: ChannelSetup;
// NOTE: populated at setup() and updateConversations(), but currently not
// read by any inbound handler. When adapter-level gating lands (engage_mode
// applied here) or when dynamic group registration is added, this map goes
// stale after setup unless updateConversations() is actively called on every
// messaging_groups / messaging_group_agents mutation. See ACTION-ITEMS.md
// item 17.
let conversations: Map<string, ConversationConfig>;
// Keyed by platformId. Multiple agents may be wired to the same
// conversation — this holds all their configs so the bridge can apply the
// most-permissive engage rule at gate time and only subscribe when at
// least one wiring requested 'mention-sticky'.
//
// STALENESS: populated at setup() and updateConversations(). If wirings
// change after setup, updateConversations() must be called to refresh
// (ACTION-ITEMS item 17).
let conversations: Map<string, ConversationConfig[]>;
let gatewayAbort: AbortController | null = null;
function buildConversationMap(configs: ConversationConfig[]): Map<string, ConversationConfig> {
const map = new Map<string, ConversationConfig>();
function buildConversationMap(configs: ConversationConfig[]): Map<string, ConversationConfig[]> {
const map = new Map<string, ConversationConfig[]>();
for (const conv of configs) {
map.set(conv.platformId, conv);
const existing = map.get(conv.platformId);
if (existing) existing.push(conv);
else map.set(conv.platformId, [conv]);
}
return map;
}
/**
* Should a message from (channelId, kind) engage any of the wired agents?
*
* - `mention` — engages only when the message actually @-mentions
* the bot (the bridge already sees it here because
* Chat SDK only forwards subscribed / mentioned /
* DM messages)
* - `mention-sticky` — same as `mention` for gating, PLUS we subscribe
* the thread so later messages arrive via the
* subscribed path and fall through to an
* engage-all style treatment
* - `pattern` — regex test against message text; `.` = always
*
* We take the union across wired agents — if any one of them would engage,
* the message goes through. Per-agent filtering after that happens in the
* host router (see src/router.ts pickAgents).
*/
function shouldEngage(
channelId: string,
source: 'subscribed' | 'mention' | 'dm',
text: string,
): { engage: boolean; stickySubscribe: boolean } {
const configs = conversations.get(channelId);
// Unknown conversation — forward anyway (may be a new group that
// hasn't been registered yet; central routing will log + drop cleanly).
if (!configs || configs.length === 0) return { engage: true, stickySubscribe: false };
let engage = false;
let stickySubscribe = false;
for (const cfg of configs) {
switch (cfg.engageMode) {
case 'mention':
if (source === 'mention' || source === 'dm') engage = true;
break;
case 'mention-sticky':
if (source === 'mention' || source === 'dm') {
engage = true;
stickySubscribe = true;
} else if (source === 'subscribed') {
// Thread was already subscribed on a prior mention — treat as
// engage-all so follow-ups in the thread reach the agent.
engage = true;
}
break;
case 'pattern': {
const pattern = cfg.engagePattern ?? '.';
try {
if (pattern === '.' || new RegExp(pattern).test(text)) engage = true;
} catch {
// Invalid regex → fail open so the admin can see something and fix.
engage = true;
}
break;
}
}
if (engage && stickySubscribe) break;
}
return { engage, stickySubscribe };
}
async function messageToInbound(message: ChatMessage): Promise<InboundMessage> {
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
const serialized = message.toJSON() as Record<string, any>;
@@ -166,33 +232,54 @@ export function createChatSdkBridge(config: ChatSdkBridgeConfig): ChannelAdapter
logger: 'silent',
});
// Subscribed threads — forward all messages
// Subscribed threads — the conversation is already active (via prior
// mention-sticky engagement or admin wiring). Gate on engageMode so a
// plain 'mention' wiring doesn't keep firing after a one-off mention.
chat.onSubscribedMessage(async (thread, message) => {
const channelId = adapter.channelIdFromThreadId(thread.id);
const text = typeof message.content === 'string' ? message.content : '';
const decision = shouldEngage(channelId, 'subscribed', text);
if (!decision.engage) return;
await setupConfig.onInbound(channelId, thread.id, await messageToInbound(message));
});
// @mention in unsubscribed thread — forward + subscribe
// @mention in an unsubscribed thread — always engage; subscribe only
// if the wiring is 'mention-sticky'.
chat.onNewMention(async (thread, message) => {
const channelId = adapter.channelIdFromThreadId(thread.id);
const text = typeof message.content === 'string' ? message.content : '';
const decision = shouldEngage(channelId, 'mention', text);
if (!decision.engage) return;
await setupConfig.onInbound(channelId, thread.id, await messageToInbound(message));
await thread.subscribe();
if (decision.stickySubscribe) {
await thread.subscribe();
}
});
// DMs — always forward + subscribe. Pass thread.id so sub-thread
// context carries through to delivery (Slack users can open threads
// inside a DM). The router collapses DM sub-threads to one session
// (is_group=0 short-circuits the per-thread escalation).
// DMs — apply engage rules too, but DMs typically default to pattern='.'
// at setup time so this is a pass-through in practice. sticky subscribe
// follows the same rule as a group mention.
//
// Thread id is passed through so sub-thread context reaches delivery
// (Slack users can open threads inside a DM). The router collapses DM
// sub-threads to one session (is_group=0 short-circuits the per-thread
// escalation).
chat.onDirectMessage(async (thread, message) => {
const channelId = adapter.channelIdFromThreadId(thread.id);
const text = typeof message.content === 'string' ? message.content : '';
const decision = shouldEngage(channelId, 'dm', text);
log.info('Inbound DM received', {
adapter: adapter.name,
channelId,
sender: (message.author as any)?.fullName ?? (message.author as any)?.userId ?? 'unknown',
threadId: thread.id,
engage: decision.engage,
});
if (!decision.engage) return;
await setupConfig.onInbound(channelId, thread.id, await messageToInbound(message));
await thread.subscribe();
if (decision.stickySubscribe) {
await thread.subscribe();
}
});
// Handle button clicks (ask_user_question)