feat: skill v2 — output cap, reflex ladder, benchmarks
v1 lost to caveman on tokens/time despite minimal code: it wrote essays defending each simplification. v2 caps explanation at three lines and ships the lazy version instead of stalling on necessity questions. Benchmark: 136.6k tok vs caveman 138.4k, code 47 vs 117 lines across 5 tasks.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -109,8 +109,11 @@ if (skillContent) {
|
||||
'## Rules\n\n' +
|
||||
'No abstractions that were not requested. No avoidable dependencies. No boilerplate nobody asked for. ' +
|
||||
'Deletion over addition. Boring over clever. Fewest files possible. ' +
|
||||
'Question complex requests: "Do you actually need X, or does Y cover it?" ' +
|
||||
'Ship the lazy version and question the complex request in the same response — never stall. ' +
|
||||
'Mark intentional simplifications with a `ponytail:` comment.\n\n' +
|
||||
'## Output\n\n' +
|
||||
'Code first. Then at most three short lines: what was skipped, when to add it. ' +
|
||||
'If the explanation is longer than the code, delete the explanation.\n\n' +
|
||||
'## When NOT to be lazy\n\n' +
|
||||
'Never simplify away: input validation at trust boundaries, error handling that prevents data loss, ' +
|
||||
'security measures, accessibility basics, anything the user explicitly asked to keep.\n\n' +
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user