Commit Graph
13 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
DietrichGebertandClaude Opus 4.8 d9e1480c74 feat: add ponytail-debt skill (#40)
Closes the last gap from the field review: deferral creep. /ponytail-debt
greps the repo for `ponytail:` comment markers and prints a ledger
(file:line, what was simplified, ceiling, upgrade trigger), flagging any
marker with no trigger as the rot risk. One-shot, reports only.

Full parity like ponytail-audit: skill + commands/.toml + .opencode/.md + pi
registerCommand (+ test) + agent-portability + README.

Verified: tests 32/32 (pi command list updated), rule check green, the scan
finds the repo's real markers, and a live end-to-end run produced a correct
ledger (2 markers, 1 no-trigger, prose/examples excluded).

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-15 02:32:45 +02:00
DietrichGebertandClaude Opus 4.8 f3da910b4f feat: refine ruleset from a full-project field review (#39)
* feat: refine ruleset from a full-project field review

A reviewer ran ponytail across a 9-phase rewrite (protocol, PC app, simulator,
RPi daemon, ESP32 firmware) and flagged three gaps. All three land in SKILL.md
and propagate to AGENTS.md + the rule copies:

- Promote the one-runnable-check rule to a headline ("Lazy code without its
  check is unfinished"), enforced as a check-rule-copies invariant.
- Hardware carve-out in "When NOT to be lazy": a real device is never the spec
  ideal (clock drift, sensor offset), leave the calibration knob.
- Clarify the Output rule: explanation the user explicitly asked for is not
  debt, only unrequested prose is.

Fallback instructions kept in sync. Rule-copy check + tests green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test: add a behavior gate proving the refinements actually fire

The refinements were verified as injected text, but injected != behavioral.
This adds a behavior eval that probes each refined rule on a task that should
trigger it:

- hardware    -> does the output leave a calibration knob?
- explanation -> when a write-up is explicitly requested, is it given in full?
- onecheck    -> is a runnable check left behind?

benchmarks/behavior.yaml runs the probes (baseline vs ponytail arm); the
grader benchmarks/behavior.js is proven by tests/behavior.test.js (8 cases,
RED/GREEN, no API key, runs in CI). Live-confirmed: the model under the
current ruleset passes all three gates, graded by the same grader.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-15 02:02:50 +02:00
92efc4a648 feat: add ponytail-audit skill (#20)
* Add ponytail-audit skill

Whole-codebase audit for over-engineering. Scans a repository and produces a
ranked report of things to delete, simplify, or replace with stdlib/native
equivalents.

* Drop counting-by-number heuristics: remove Phase 5 (structural audit) and TODO-age heuristic per review

* feat: slim ponytail-audit and add cross-platform parity

Rewrite the ponytail-audit skill to ponytail-review's lean shape (35 lines,
was 111): same five tags, repo-wide scope, ranked output. Drop the
prescriptive phase walkthrough, sampling rules, report template, and the
license frontmatter that no other skill carries.

Add the adapters the skill was missing so it ships on every supported
platform the way ponytail-review does:
- commands/ponytail-audit.toml
- .opencode/command/ponytail-audit.md
- pi-extension registerCommand (+ test)
- agent-portability and README entries

Co-authored-by: Alexander Brandt <github@a13x.de>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Emeriko <dietrich.gebert@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-14 17:35:45 +02:00
EmerikoandClaude Opus 4.8 0882e2d256 docs: correct ponytail-help update steps to match Claude Code docs
Use auto-update or marketplace refresh + /reload-plugins (not reinstall), and
note that an unrecognized /plugin means Claude Code itself needs updating.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-13 14:18:42 +02:00
EmerikoandClaude Opus 4.8 82cff4bcd2 docs: add Update section to ponytail-help
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-13 14:14:34 +02:00
EmerikoandClaude Opus 4.8 88431defba docs: replace em dashes with plain punctuation across prose
Swap em dashes for commas/colons/periods in the README, skills, AGENTS.md and
its five rule copies, examples, command files, and benchmark README. Rule
copies stay in sync (same edit applied to all) and the invariant guard passes.

Left untouched on purpose: the vendored caveman SKILL.md (verbatim third-party
text), the dated benchmark writeups in results/ (historical records), and
.js code comments.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-13 06:06:03 +02:00
DietrichGebert 46c5c28b35 feat: add OpenCode adapter
Thin OpenCode plugin injecting the ponytail ruleset via experimental.chat.system.transform, reusing the shared instruction builder. Verified end-to-end on OpenCode 1.17.4. Supersedes #15.
2026-06-13 03:20:44 +02:00
Paul c16f967d37 feat: codex support 2026-06-12 08:49:33 -04:00
dgebertandClaude Fable 5 cbb8859f39 feat: skill v4 — test reflex, ceiling comments, robust-variant rule
Hardening per the A-F benchmark brief: non-trivial logic leaves one
runnable check; ponytail: comments on ceiling-bearing shortcuts name
the ceiling and upgrade path; prefer the edge-case-correct stdlib
option at equal size. Applied to SKILL.md, all cross-agent rule
copies, the hook fallback, and a guard line in ponytail-review.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-12 12:11:47 +02:00
Emeriko 243a28f1dd feat: skill v3 — compress SKILL.md 115 to 95 lines
Skill preaching minimalism was 2x caveman length. Smaller file cuts
per-read and per-session-injection cost. Benchmark: beats caveman on
all areas now — 135.7k vs 138.4k tokens, 127s vs 136s, 47 vs 117 loc.
2026-06-12 03:58:44 +02:00
Emeriko 3b4626a987 feat: skill v2 — output cap, reflex ladder, benchmarks
v1 lost to caveman on tokens/time despite minimal code: it wrote
essays defending each simplification. v2 caps explanation at three
lines and ships the lazy version instead of stalling on necessity
questions. Benchmark: 136.6k tok vs caveman 138.4k, code 47 vs 117
lines across 5 tasks.
2026-06-12 03:54:06 +02:00
Emeriko 7a3475c0f4 feat: full plugin integration + cross-agent rules 2026-06-12 03:25:15 +02:00
Emeriko ef604945d8 feat: add ponytail skill, examples, README 2026-06-12 03:05:59 +02:00