Use an announcement banner instead of the badge

Replace the flat orange badge with a clickable terminal-style banner
image: the "he's building" sticker, a bold headline, and an orange
JOIN THE WAITLIST call to action. Localized banners for EN/ES/KO.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

README.es.md

@@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
   <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/licencia-MIT-111111?style=flat-square" alt="MIT license">
 </p>
 
+<p align="center">
+  <a href="https://trendshift.io/repositories/50668" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><img src="https://trendshift.io/api/badge/trendshift/repositories/50668/daily" alt="DietrichGebert/ponytail | Trendshift" width="250" height="55"/></a>
+  <a href="https://trendshift.io/repositories/50668" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><img src="https://trendshift.io/api/badge/trendshift/repositories/50668/weekly" alt="DietrichGebert/ponytail | Trendshift" width="250" height="55"/></a>
+</p>
+
 <p align="center">
   <strong>~54% menos código (hasta 94%) &middot; ~20% más barato &middot; ~27% más rápido &middot; 100% seguro</strong><br>
   <sub>Medido en sesiones reales de Claude Code editando un repo open-source real (FastAPI + React), contra el mismo agente sin skill. ~54% es el promedio de 12 tareas de feature (Haiku 4.5, n=4); llega al 94% cuando un agente sobre-construye (un selector de fechas) y es casi cero cuando el código ya es mínimo. ponytail mantiene cada guarda de seguridad, mientras que un prompt pelado de "escribe one-liners" se salta una. (El benchmark anterior de un solo disparo reportaba 80-94% como cifra plana; contra un baseline agéntico justo, ese es el techo por tarea, no el promedio.) <a href="benchmarks/results/2026-06-18-agentic.md">Reporte completo</a> &middot; <a href="benchmarks/">reprodúcelo</a>.</sub>
@@ -30,6 +35,10 @@
 
 ---
 
+<p align="center">
+  <a href="https://ponytail.dev/soon"><img src="assets/waitlist-banner-es.png" alt="Algo nuevo está por llegar, únete a la lista" width="760"></a>
+</p>
+
 Lo conoces. Cola de caballo larga. Lentes ovalados. Lleva más tiempo en la empresa que el control de versiones. Le muestras cincuenta líneas; las mira, no dice nada, y las reemplaza por una.
 
 Ponytail lo pone dentro de tu agente de IA.

README.ko.md

@@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
   <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-111111?style=flat-square" alt="MIT license">
 </p>
 
+<p align="center">
+  <a href="https://trendshift.io/repositories/50668" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><img src="https://trendshift.io/api/badge/trendshift/repositories/50668/daily" alt="DietrichGebert/ponytail | Trendshift" width="250" height="55"/></a>
+  <a href="https://trendshift.io/repositories/50668" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><img src="https://trendshift.io/api/badge/trendshift/repositories/50668/weekly" alt="DietrichGebert/ponytail | Trendshift" width="250" height="55"/></a>
+</p>
+
 <p align="center">
   <strong>코드 약 54% 감소(최대 94%) &middot; 약 20% 저렴 &middot; 약 27% 빠름 &middot; 100% 안전</strong><br>
   <sub>실제 오픈소스 저장소(FastAPI + React)를 고치는 실제 Claude Code 세션에서, 스킬을 끈 같은 에이전트와 견줘 측정했다. 약 54%는 기능 작업 12건의 평균이다(Haiku 4.5, n=4). 에이전트가 과하게 짤 여지가 있는 곳(날짜 선택기)에선 94%까지 오르고, 코드가 이미 최소한인 곳에선 0에 가깝다. ponytail은 안전 가드를 하나도 빼놓지 않지만, 그냥 "한 줄로 써"라고만 시킨 프롬프트는 그중 하나를 놓친다. (예전 단발성 벤치마크는 80-94%를 단일 수치로 내세웠는데, 공정한 에이전트 기준선에 견주면 그건 평균이 아니라 작업별 상한이다.) <a href="benchmarks/results/2026-06-18-agentic.md">전체 보고서</a> &middot; <a href="benchmarks/">직접 재현하기</a>.</sub>
@@ -30,6 +35,10 @@
 
 ---
 
+<p align="center">
+  <a href="https://ponytail.dev/soon"><img src="assets/waitlist-banner-ko.png" alt="새로운 것이 다가오고 있습니다, 대기자 명단 신청" width="760"></a>
+</p>
+
 이런 사람, 다들 알 거다. 긴 포니테일에 타원형 안경. 버전 관리 시스템보다 회사에 오래 있었다. 코드 쉰 줄을 들이밀면 잠깐 보더니, 말없이 한 줄로 바꿔 놓는다.
 
 Ponytail은 그를 당신의 AI 에이전트 안에 앉혀 둔다.

README.md

@@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
   <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-111111?style=flat-square" alt="MIT license">
 </p>
 
+<p align="center">
+  <a href="https://trendshift.io/repositories/50668" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><img src="https://trendshift.io/api/badge/trendshift/repositories/50668/daily" alt="DietrichGebert/ponytail | Trendshift" width="250" height="55"/></a>
+  <a href="https://trendshift.io/repositories/50668" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><img src="https://trendshift.io/api/badge/trendshift/repositories/50668/weekly" alt="DietrichGebert/ponytail | Trendshift" width="250" height="55"/></a>
+</p>
+
 <p align="center">
   <strong>~54% less code (up to 94%) &middot; ~20% cheaper &middot; ~27% faster &middot; 100% safe</strong><br>
   <sub>Measured on real Claude Code sessions editing a real open-source repo (FastAPI + React), against the same agent with no skill. ~54% is the mean across 12 feature tasks (Haiku 4.5, n=4); it reaches 94% where an agent over-builds (a date picker) and is near zero where the code is already minimal. ponytail keeps every safety guard while a bare "write one-liners" prompt drops one. (The earlier single-shot benchmark reported 80-94% as a flat figure; against a fair agentic baseline that is the per-task ceiling, not the average.) <a href="benchmarks/results/2026-06-18-agentic.md">Full writeup</a> &middot; <a href="benchmarks/">reproduce it</a>.</sub>
@@ -30,6 +35,10 @@
 
 ---
 
+<p align="center">
+  <a href="https://ponytail.dev/soon"><img src="assets/waitlist-banner.png" alt="Something's coming, join the waitlist" width="760"></a>
+</p>
+
 You know him. Long ponytail. Oval glasses. Has been at the company longer than the version control. You show him fifty lines; he looks at them, says nothing, and replaces them with one.
 
 Ponytail puts him inside your AI agent.