EmerikoandClaude Opus 4.8
0bf152a987
Re-ran the cost benchmark at 30 reps per cell on Claude (Haiku/Sonnet/Opus): ponytail is 42-75% cheaper than no-skill, not the previously published 47-77%. The direction holds, both ends came in a few points lower. Updates the README headline and body, the benchmark chart subtitle, and the benchmarks/README cost table, and adds a dated results doc with full method. Also adds the OpenAI (gpt-4.1-mini/gpt-5.4-mini/gpt-5.5) and Gemini configs. On OpenAI reasoning models ponytail costs more, not less, so the claim stays Claude-scoped. Gemini run pending a fresh-quota day. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Benchmark
Three arms (no skill, caveman, ponytail), three models, five everyday tasks, 10 runs per cell, median reported. Code LOC is counted from fenced code blocks; tokens, cost, and latency come straight from the API.
Reproduce
Claude (Haiku / Sonnet / Opus)
Requires an Anthropic API key and Node.js ≥ 22.22.0 (promptfoo's engine constraint —
check with node --version and upgrade if needed):
cp ../.env.example ../.env # add your ANTHROPIC_API_KEY
npx promptfoo@latest eval -c promptfooconfig.yaml --env-file ../.env --repeat 10
npx promptfoo@latest view
--env-file ../.env is required because promptfoo reads .env from the current
directory (benchmarks/), not the repo root where the file lives.
Local models via Ollama
No API key or promptfoo required. Runs against any model served by Ollama:
ollama pull llama3.2 # or any other model
python benchmarks/benchmark-local.py --model llama3.2 --repeat 3
See benchmarks/results/2026-06-15-llama3.2-local.md for what to expect: the skill works
well on instruction-following models (Claude-class) but transfers poorly to small local
models where the multi-step decision ladder isn't reliably followed.
Tasks: email validator, JS debounce, CSV sum, React countdown, FastAPI rate-limit (see promptfooconfig.yaml). Single-shot completions, default temperature.
Median results (10 runs, 2026-06-13; cost re-verified at 30 runs, 2026-06-17)
Code (lines)
| arm | Haiku | Sonnet | Opus |
|---|---|---|---|
| baseline (no skill) | 518 | 693 | 256 |
| caveman | 116 | 120 | 67 |
| ponytail | 39 | 44 | 51 |
Cost (USD, 5 tasks; 30 runs, 2026-06-17)
| arm | Haiku | Sonnet | Opus |
|---|---|---|---|
| baseline (no skill) | 0.030 | 0.137 | 0.137 |
| caveman | 0.014 | 0.046 | 0.072 |
| ponytail | 0.011 | 0.035 | 0.079 |
Latency (seconds, 5 tasks)
| arm | Haiku | Sonnet | Opus |
|---|---|---|---|
| baseline (no skill) | 37.7 | 124.1 | 58.7 |
| caveman | 14.9 | 34.7 | 23.1 |
| ponytail | 9.9 | 20.1 | 18.0 |
Versus baseline, ponytail writes 80-94% less code, costs 42-75% less, and runs 3-6x faster, on every Claude model. Cost re-verified at 30 reps, with OpenAI and Gemini arms, in results/2026-06-17-cost-verification.md.
Metrics
| File | Metric | Behavior |
|---|---|---|
loc.js |
loc |
Measurement - always passes, records line count |
correctness.js |
correct |
Gate - fails if generated code doesn't work |
correctness.js extracts fenced code blocks and runs per-task checks (spawns Python/Node for email, debounce, CSV; structural regex for React and FastAPI). A broken one-liner that scores great on LOC will fail on correctness.
Note: The React countdown and FastAPI rate-limit checks are keyword/structural only (no runtime execution), so they verify plausible structure rather than full correctness. The email, debounce, and CSV checks execute the code.
Prerequisites
Running the benchmark requires Python 3, pandas, and Node.js (18+).
Notes
- Caveman is a prose-compression skill (it leaves code "normal"), so it lands between baseline and ponytail on code size and wins mainly on prose tokens.
- Cost reflects single-shot calls that re-send the skill every time. In real sessions the skill is injected once and prompt-cached, so the cost gap widens further in ponytail's favor.
- These are everyday tasks. For production-grade specs, where an unconstrained agent bloats much harder, see the writeups in
results/.